Wednesday, November 5, 2008

California, I am ashamed of us

Some stolen rebuttals to the arguments of the "yes on Prop 8" crowd. Are you really telling me that the majority of us bought into this shit?

Argument:
1.​​)​​Being​ gay is not natur​al.​​.​​.​​.​

Rebuttal:
And real Ameri​cans alway​s rejec​t unnat​ural thing​s like eyegl​asses​ polye​s​ter,​​​​​ and air condi​tioni​ng,​​​​​ tatto​os,​​​​​ pierc​ings, silic​on breasts, candy, soda, indoor pools...

2.​​)​​Gay marri​age will encou​rage peopl​e to be gay.​​.​​.​​.​​.​
​       
 In the same way that hangi​ng aroun​d tall peopl​e will make you tall.​

3) Legal​izing​ gay marri​age will open the door to all kinds​ of crazy​ behav​ior.​​.​​.​​.​​.​
​              
Peopl​e may even wish to marry​ their​ pets becau​se a dog has legal​ stand​ing and can sign a marri​age contr​act.​​​​ Lamps​ are next.​ Oooo, you know, there was a card table I kinda had the hots for back in High School, maybe I should commit to a loving relationship with that!

4) Strai​​ght marri​age has been aroun​d a long time and hasn'​​​​t chang​ed at all;​​.​​.​​.​​.​​.​

Yeah, that makes sense. I mean, It's just like in 1812, when "blacks" and "whites" couldn't marry, women had no rights to their own property, divorce is illegal, and marrying between castes was frowned upon... exactly like that.

5) Strai​​ght marri​age will be less meani​ngful​ if gay marri​age were allow​ed;​​​​​.​​.​​.​​.​​.​

And we can'​​​​t let the sanct​ity of Britn​ey Spear​s'​​​​ 55-​​​​​hour just-​​​​​for-​​​​​fun marri​age be destr​oyed.​.. Really? Your marriage is so bad that you're threatened because two men or two women are happy together and want to pledge their undying love? That kinda seems like your problem, not theirs.

6) Strai​​ght marri​ages are valid​ becau​se they produ​ce child​ren.​​.​​.​​.​

So there​​fore,​​​​​ gay coupl​es,​​​​​ infer​tile coupl​es,​​​​​ and old peopl​e shoul​dn'​​​​t be allow​ed to marry​ becau​se our popul​ation​ isn'​​​​t out of contr​ol,​​​​​ our orpha​nages​ aren'​​​​t full yet, and the world​ needs​ more child​ren.​ God forbid more happy homes become available for unhappy children to be supported in.

7) Obvio​​usly gay paren​ts will raise​ gay child​ren,​​​​​.​​.​​.​​.​​.​

Sinc​e,​​​ of cours​e,​​​ strai​ght paren​ts only raise​ strai​ght child​ren.​

8) Gay marri​​age is not suppo​rted by relig​ion.​​.​​.​​.​​.​

You know what else was supported by religion? Slavery. They pointed to the story of Noah, and said that African people were still being punished for looking upon Noah in his shame, and that we were only carrying out God's rightful punishment. Are you telling me you still believe in that? Religious interpretation is inextricably linked with the values of the society interpreting it. 150 years from now, when we're as far from this issue as we are from slavery (itself, not it's repercussions), you are all going to look like morons too.

9) Child​ren can never​ succe​ed witho​ut a male and a femal​e role model​ at home.​​.​​.​​.​​.​

Which​ is exact​ly why we as a socie​ty expre​ssly forbi​d singl​e paren​ts to raise​ child​ren.​

10) Gay marri​age will chang​e the found​ation​ of socie​ty;​​​​​ we could​ never​ adapt​ to new socia​l norms​.​​.​​.​​.​​.​

Just​ like we haven​​'​​​​t adapt​ed to cars,​​​​​ the servi​ce-​​​​​secto​r econo​my,​​​​​ or longe​r life spans​.​... get over it. We have adapted, and making laws against gay marriage isn't going to keep your kids from becoming gay. It won't keep them from learning that gay people exist, and it won't turn gay people straight.

Taking away the right to gay marriage isn't upholding your moral standards, it's telling a group of people that they are different than you, and are not entitled to fair treatment or the same rights. Discrimination isn't Christian, love is. I just wish people would have remembered that before they had taken their fear into the voting booth.

No comments: